The danger of looking like an influencer when you are a specialist.
5 min read
A professional with twenty years of experience records a video dancing with captions flashing on screen, because someone told him it performs better. The video works: it reaches many people. And still, the calendar does not change. Worse: a few long-standing clients mention, a little awkwardly, that they found it different.
What happened there has a name. The format contradicted the competence, and when that happens, the audience believes the format.
Format is language. Before hearing what you say, a person has already classified the kind of professional you are by the packaging of the message. This happens in seconds and automatically. No later argument fully undoes that first classification.
There is a difference between being accessible and being trivial. Accessible is explaining a difficult concept clearly, without unnecessary jargon, respecting the intelligence of the listener. Trivial is reducing your field to a ten-second trick to please an algorithm.
Accessibility increases authority because it demonstrates command: only those who truly understood can explain simply. Triviality destroys authority because it suggests your work fits into ten seconds. And if it fits into ten seconds, why would it cost a lot?
There is also the question of the audience you attract. Trivial content attracts a broad, poorly qualified audience, people who consume for entertainment and never hire. You end up working to maintain a crowd that is not your client, and the cost of that is your time, your most expensive asset.
This does not mean being stern, distant or boring. It means choosing registers compatible with what you sell. You can be human, show behind the scenes, show routine, have humour. The criterion is different: at no point may the material suggest your knowledge is shallow.
The practical question, before publishing anything, is this: if my most demanding client saw this, would he respect me more or less than he does today? If the answer is less, the reach of that content is not worth it. Reach that costs reputation is the most expensive reach there is.
When the format contradicts the competence, the audience believes the format.